Keep the focus on your child’s safety and stability without putting them in the middle. We guide parents through when a Guardian ad Litem (GAL) is required in juvenile court and what works in private custody cases, including evaluators, parenting coordinators, and careful in-camera interviews.
Quick answer: In most private custody cases, North Carolina courts do not appoint a separate child’s lawyer. In abuse, neglect, or dependency cases in juvenile court, the judge appoints a Guardian ad Litem (GAL) team, including an attorney advocate, to represent the child’s best interests. Judges in private cases use tools like parenting coordinators, custody evaluations, or in-camera interviews to understand a child’s needs without pulling the child into the conflict.
Need to protect your child without dragging them into court? We help you choose the right path—GAL where required, targeted motions in private cases, and orders that schools and doctors can follow.
Krispen Culbertson, North Carolina family lawyer with 20+ years handling child-focused custody strategy: GAL coordination in juvenile court, in-camera interviews when appropriate, parenting coordinators, custody evaluations, and clean orders that schools and doctors can follow.
Memberships: North Carolina State Bar; local family law sections. Courts: District Court calendars statewide with regular hearings in Guilford County.
Where a GAL appears: GALs are standard in abuse, neglect, dependency matters in juvenile court. In most private custody disputes, there is no separate child’s lawyer.
Child’s wishes: A mature child’s views may be considered, but do not control the outcome. Courts prefer neutral proof and limited exposure for the child.
Better tools in private cases: parenting coordinators, custody evaluations, school and medical records, and brief in-camera interviews get judges what they need.
Protect the child: use privacy limits, neutral exchanges, focused questions for professionals, and agency-ready orders.
Juvenile court (abuse, neglect, dependency). The court appoints a GAL team for the child. The GAL meets with the child, investigates, and works with an attorney advocate to report best-interest recommendations to the court.
Private custody (Chapter 50). In most private custody cases, the child does not have a separate lawyer. The court relies on parent testimony, records, and qualified professionals. Judges may order a custody evaluation, appoint a parenting coordinator after a custody order in high-conflict cases, or conduct a limited in-camera interview with safeguards.
In an abuse, neglect, or dependency case, a GAL is routine. We frame safety facts, coordinate with the GAL program, and keep the focus on the child’s needs and services.
If the other side asks for a separate child’s lawyer in a private dispute, we explain why it is not necessary, propose safer alternatives, and protect the child from being drawn into the fight.
For post-order high conflict, a parenting coordinator can help implement the order. We propose scope, communication rules, and a clean appointment order.
Judges often rely on neutral professionals. We define the scope, share key records, and keep questions focused on health, school, safety, and stability.
When appropriate, a short, private conversation with the judge can help. We request the interview with guardrails that reduce pressure on the child.
We manage school and medical records with targeted requests and privacy limits. Orders tell agencies exactly what to share and with whom.
Clear language for decision-making, releases, school pick-up, travel, and medical care prevents confusion and protects the child.
1) Track selection
Confirm juvenile court with GAL or private custody path.
2) Evidence plan
Identify neutral records and professionals; set privacy limits.
3) Motion strategy
Parenting coordinator, evaluation, or in-camera interview as needed.
4) Narrow asks
Orders for decision-making, releases, and appointments.
5) Implementation
Follow up with schools, doctors, and the other side to reduce conflict.
A. Benton — “K.E. Culbertson kept our child out of the fight and still gave the judge what was needed. The order is clear and school follows it.”
M. Fields — “Mr. Culbertson suggested a parenting coordinator instead of forcing our teen to be involved. Conflict dropped fast.”
T. Nguyen — “Krispen mapped the records, talked with teachers, and arranged a short interview. Thoughtful, steady, and child-first.”
S. Ortiz — “Culbertson and Associates protected privacy and still proved what mattered. The new schedule actually works.”
L. Carter — “They explained GAL vs. private custody in plain English. We chose the right track and moved forward without drama.”
J. Ahmed — “Clear plan, clear order, no surprises. Teachers knew exactly what to do the next week.”
Culbertson & Associates
315 Spring Garden St Ste #300
Greensboro, NC 27401
(336) 272-4299 • culbertsonatlaw.com
Hours: Mon–Fri 8:30 AM–5:00 PM • Area served: North Carolina
No Comments
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.