Fix what went wrong or protect a win. We handle North Carolina family law appeals and post-judgment relief—clean records, tight deadlines, standards-of-review arguments, and practical remedies that courts and agencies can follow.
Krispen Culbertson, North Carolina family law appeals and post-judgment attorney, practicing for 20+ years in trial and appellate courts. Focus on notices of appeal, stays, records/transcripts, standards of review, Rule 59 and Rule 60 motions, and targeted modifications/enforcement after judgment.
Memberships: North Carolina State Bar; local family law sections. Courts: District Court calendars statewide with regular hearings in Greensboro and High Point; appellate filings in the North Carolina Court of Appeals.
We prepare and file a compliant notice of appeal, identify appealable issues, and build the record: transcript requests, exhibits, and any Rule 54(b) certification questions. Briefs present the facts, issues, and standards of review in a way the Court can act on.
Stays and protecting your position
Appeals don’t automatically pause the order. We assess stays and bonds, and—when appropriate—seek temporary relief to prevent irreparable harm while the appeal moves forward.
Rule 59: new trial or amending the judgment
For certain errors, a timely Rule 59 motion can correct the judgment faster than a full appeal. We identify the right grounds and file within the strict time window.
Rule 60: relief from judgment
When new evidence, mistake, fraud, or other listed grounds apply, Rule 60 can undo or adjust the order. We tailor the motion to the facts and the rule’s limits.
Missing findings and clerical corrections
Domestic orders require adequate findings tied to the evidence. We address incomplete findings or clerical errors so agencies (employers, plan administrators, schools) can follow the result.
Modifying custody, support, or alimony
When circumstances materially change, the proper path is modification—not appeal. We file clean, supported motions with updated financials and clear proposed orders.
Enforcement and post-judgment cleanup
From wage withholding to contempt and arrears ledgers, we put enforcement on a track that works—and avoid duplicating hearings.
Record on appeal and briefing
Transcripts, exhibits, and the settled record shape your chances. We manage deadlines, formatting, and briefing so the Court sees the exact issues that matter.
4) Draft & file Notice of appeal or post-judgment motion with precise asks.
5) Next steps Briefing schedule, settlement options, or targeted modification.
FAQs
What’s the difference between an appeal and a Rule 59/60 motion?
An appeal asks a higher court to review what happened; Rule 59/60 asks the trial court to correct or revisit its own order. We choose the path that fits your facts and deadlines.
How fast do I have to act?
Very quickly. Appeals and post-judgment remedies have short windows. We confirm your exact deadline at intake and file the right document first.
Do I need a transcript?
Often yes. The record—transcripts, exhibits, orders—drives the outcome on appeal. We request and settle the record early to avoid delay.
Will an appeal stop wage withholding or a custody schedule?
Not by default. We evaluate stays, bonds, and interim terms to protect your position while the appeal is pending.
Can I appeal a temporary order?
Some temporary orders aren’t immediately appealable. We assess alternatives like targeted motions or quick hearings to get you to a workable final order.
Can I enforce while the other side appeals?
Usually yes unless there’s a stay. We continue enforcement and respond to any stay request with facts that support your position.
Why North Carolina families choose Culbertson & Associates
20+ years briefing, records, and post-judgment strategy
Practical remedies: stays, clean orders, and agency-ready language
Clear fee scopes for appeals vs. targeted motions
Weekly District Court calendars in Guilford County; appellate filings statewide
Client reviews
★★★★★
Maria G. — “They moved fast to preserve my appeal and got a stay that kept our schedule stable. Clear plan, zero surprises.”
★★★★★
R. Patel — “Our order missed key findings. Krispen fixed it with a precise motion and the new order finally worked with HR and the school.”
★★★★★
Dan W. — “They handled the transcript, record, and briefing. Professional, responsive, and relentlessly thorough.”
★★★★★
Elaine S. — “Explained appeal vs. Rule 60 in plain English and chose the route that actually solved the problem.”
★★★★★
Tom K. — “Kept enforcement on track during the appeal. Payments finally arrived on time.”
★★★★★
J. Nguyen — “Smart, efficient, and strategic. The briefing was tight and focused on what mattered.”
No Comments
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.